I have just exchanged words with Naomi over her emancipation and have realised that all though I responded to each and every attack she made on me, she hardly addressed any of my defences. Is that because, like in a game of battleships, I made direct hits that blew her out of the water, or did she simply not venture out into the rough high seas.
Accusations of Exposing her Private Business
A day ago, I received the following comment from her
I will never converse in writing with you ever again for you to cut and paste to share such personal topics on abuse with the world in an attempt to belittle what you have done to us all
If I had just done this, off the cuff, I suppose I would have to answer for unnecessarily exposing her. An unwritten rule when writing on the Internet. However, those rules do not apply if she has already done to me what she accuses me of doing to her. They become ineffective because she makes herself a hypocrite. You cannot complain about the transgression of a rule that you break.
About 2 years ago I felt as though Naomi wasnot loyal to me, so there existed a family secret, or, something that had happened that Kay decided she wanted to keep a secret. I decided to divulge that secret to Naomi to test her loyalty to me. Within 72 hours she had broken my confidence and had told Kay what I told her. It caused some serious problems. So, how on earth can she complain about me when she did worse, she did not respond to my query. She ignored it.
Leave a reply to derek7855 Cancel reply